Kendrick v. California Prison Healthcare Services, et al.

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/7/2010 to submit IFP Application or pay filing fee re 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Owen Thomas Kendrick. (Motion for IFP due by 11/29/2010). (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Kendrick v. California Prison Healthcare Services, et al. Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983 on September 30, 2010. Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, but the application is complete in that only page one was received. Plaintiff 20 must either file a complete application or pay the $350.00 filing fee. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 Within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the 23 attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative, pay 24 the $350.00 filing fee for this action. No requests for extension will be granted without a 25 showing of good cause. Within sixty (60) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall 26 submit a certified copy of his/her prison trust statement for the six month period immediately 27 preceding the filing of the complaint. 28 -1Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OWEN THOMAS KENDRICK, Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA PRISON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, et al., / 1:10-cv-01803-SMS PC ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 45 DAYS (Doc. 2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 October 7, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?