Matthews v. Holguin et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING 1 Action (Strike), with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim; ORDER that Dismissal Subject to 28 U.S.C. 1915(G) signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/19/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TYE MATTHEWS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01806-BAM PC
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
v.
H. HOLGUIN, et al.,
13
ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1915(G)
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Tye Matthews (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on September
17
30, 2010. An order was issued on December 1, 2011, dismissing the complaint, with leave to file
18
an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff was
19
warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this action would
20
be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims.
21
More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded
22
to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which
23
relief may be granted.
24
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is
25
HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
may be granted under section 1983 and the Clerk’s Office shall enter judgment. This dismissal is
2
subject to the “three-strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, No. 08-
3
15620, 2011 WL 4436248, at *4 (9th Cir. Sept. 26, 2011).
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
January 19, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?