Ibarra v. Hedgpeth
Filing
35
ORDER Regarding Stay of Proceeding; Thirty Day Deadline to Submit Proof of Filing in State Court, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/27/12. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JOHNNY LUGO IBARRA,
10
11
1:10-cv-1809-LJO-DLB (HC)
Petitioner,
ORDER REGARDING STAY OF
PROCEEDING
v.
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE TO SUBMIT
PROOF OF FILING IN STATE COURT
12
ANTHONY HEDGPETH,
13
Respondent.
14
/
15
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
17
On June 16, 2011, the Court granted Petitioner’s request to stay and hold the petition in
18
abeyance pending exhaustion in the state courts. The Court directed Petitioner to file an initial
19
status report within thirty days, and every thirty days thereafter. Petitioner has filed a total of
20
eight status reports, the most recent on February 17, 2012.
21
Petitioner continues to represent that he is in the process of obtaining counsel and an
22
investigator to present his claims to the state courts. Petitioner is advised that the Court’s order
23
staying and holding the petition in abeyance did not contemplate him obtaining counsel and/or an
24
investigator to present his claims to the state court. Rather, Petitioner is required to diligently
25
pursue his claims in a timely manner and Petitioner has failed to do so. Accordingly, Petitioner
26
is directed to file a state court petition within thirty days from the date of service of this order or
27
the stay will be vacated and the case will proceed forward. Failure to comply with this order will
28
1
1
result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to comply with a court order. Local
2
Rule 110.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
February 27, 2012
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?