Porter v. Jennings et al
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/2/2012 adopting 87 and 88 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 57 , 60 and 72 Motions.(Lundstrom, T)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAMUEL KENNETH PORTER,
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01811-AWI-DLB PC
4
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
5
v.
6
CAPTAIN JENNINGS, et al.,
ECF Nos. 87, 88
7
Defendants.
8
/
9
10
Plaintiff Samuel Kenneth Porter (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se
11
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 27, 2012, June 1, 2012, and July
12
18, 2012, Plaintiff filed several motions with the Court. ECF Nos. 57, 60, 72. The motions were
13
construed as motions for preliminary injunction. The matter was referred to a United States
14
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
15
On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which
16
was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings
17
and Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 88. Plaintiff filed an
18
Objection to the Findings and Recommendations on October 1, 2012. ECF No. 94.
19
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de
20
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
21
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012, is adopted in full;
24
and
25
2.
Plaintiff’s motions, filed April 27, 2012, June 1, 2012, and July 18, 2012, are denied.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated:
0m8i78
November 2, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?