Smith v. Allison et al
Filing
181
ORDER Striking Plaintiff's 179 Supplemental Argument in Opposition to Defendant Goss' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/17/2016. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
D. GOSS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No.: 1:10-cv-01814-LJO-JLT (PC)
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S
SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOSS’
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS
(Doc. 179)
16
On January 29, 2016, Defendant Goss filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings of
17
18
Plaintiff’s due process claim against him. (Doc. 162.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 10,
19
2016 to which Defendant Goss replied on February 16, 2016. (Docs. 164, 166.) Defendant’s motion
20
for judgment on the pleadings was deemed submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230(l) on February 16,
21
2016. However, on March 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a “supplemental argument in opposition” to
22
Defendant’s motion. Plaintiff does not have a right to file any such supplemental argument under the
23
Local Rules or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Plaintiff did not obtain leave of court to do
24
so.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Therefore, Plaintiff=s supplemental argument in opposition to Defendant Goss’ motion for
2
judgment on the pleadings, filed on March 16, 2016, is ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 17, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?