Foster v. Vasquez et al
ORDER Denying 42 Motion, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 09/08/14. (Gonzalez, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:10-cv-01830-RRB
MOTION AT DOCKET 42
CAPTAIN F. VASQUEZ; et al.,
At Docket 42 Defendants have moved to modify the scheduling order. The motion
is predicated upon the assumption that Plaintiff would be permitted to amend his complaint
to add Warden Kathleen Allison as a defendant. The Court having denied Plaintiff’s motion
to add Warden Allison,1 there is no necessity for amending the scheduling order in toto.
The Court has, however, determined that the interests of justice would be served by
extending the date for filing dispositive motions through and including October 3, 2014.
Accordingly, except as provided above, the Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order
at Docket 42 is DENIED, as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2014.
/s/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER DENYING MOTION AT DOCKET 42
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?