Foster v. Vasquez et al

Filing 46

ORDER Denying 42 Motion, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 09/08/14. (Gonzalez, R)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL FOSTER,
Case No. 1:10-cv-01830-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING
MOTION AT DOCKET 42

vs.
CAPTAIN F. VASQUEZ; et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 42 Defendants have moved to modify the scheduling order. The motion
is predicated upon the assumption that Plaintiff would be permitted to amend his complaint
to add Warden Kathleen Allison as a defendant. The Court having denied Plaintiff’s motion
to add Warden Allison,1 there is no necessity for amending the scheduling order in toto.
The Court has, however, determined that the interests of justice would be served by
extending the date for filing dispositive motions through and including October 3, 2014.
Accordingly, except as provided above, the Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order
at Docket 42 is DENIED, as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2014.
/s/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Docket 45.

ORDER DENYING MOTION AT DOCKET 42