Foster v. Vasquez et al

Filing 62

DISMISSAL ORDER signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 12/1/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL FOSTER,
Case No. 1:10-cv-01830-RRB
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL ORDER
vs.
CAPTAIN F. VASQUEZ; et al.,
Defendants.

Pending before this Court are three motions.
At Docket 56 Defendants D. Goss, Stu Sherman, F. Vasquez, and Tommy Wan
have moved for an order allowing Defendants to file redacted documents.
At Docket 58 Defendants D. Goss, Stu Sherman, F. Vasquez, and Tommy Wan
have moved for summary judgment.
At Docket 60 Plaintiff Michael Foster, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, has
moved to voluntarily dismiss the Complaint. At Docket 61 Defendants have stipulated to
the dismissal.
This Court may dismiss an action upon the request of the plaintiff on such terms as
it may consider proper. Therefore,
Defendants’ Motion for an Order Allowing Defendants to File Redacted Documents
at Docket 56 is GRANTED.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment at Docket 58 is DENIED, as moot.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss his Complaint on Own Motion at Docket 60 is
GRANTED.
Accordingly, the Complaint on file herein is DISMISSED, with prejudice.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: This 1st day of December, 2014
/s/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

DISMISSAL ORDER
Foster v. Vasquez, 1:10-cv-01830-RRB - 2