Arlonda Boatwright v. Commissioner
Filing
13
STIPULATION Extend Time; and ORDER - Plaintiff shall file Opening Brief by 5/16/2011. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/19/2011. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail _steven_rohlfing.office@speakeasy.net
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff ARLONDA K. BOATWRIGHT
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner )
)
)
of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant
)
ARLONDA K. BOATWRIGHT,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 1:10 CV-01895 SMS
STIPULATION EXTEND TIME; And
ORDER
18
19
TO THE HONORABLE SANDRA SNYDER, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF
20
THE DISTRICT COURT:
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their
22
respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall have a 30 day extension of time, to and
23
including May 16, 2011, in which to file her opening brief.
24
///
25
///
26
///
-1-
1
This request is made at the request of Plaintiff’s counsel to allow additional time to
2
fully research the issued presented and because of counsel’s press of time.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
DATE: April 14, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
5
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
6
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
7
BY: _______________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney for plaintiff Arlonda K. Boatwright
8
9
10
DATE: April 14, 2011
11
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
12
/s/ Brenda M. Pullin
13
BY: ____________________________
14
Brenda M. Pullin
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for defendant Michael Astrue
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff’s opening brief is due on May 16, 2011. All other
due dates are extended accordingly.
21
22
23
Dated:
April 19, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?