Carlos Villegas v. Cate et al

Filing 53

ORDER STRIKING Notice as Procedurally Deficient 52 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/20/15: The notice is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record as procedurally deficient. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CARLOS VILLEGAS,

11

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:10-cv-01917-AWI-SKO (PC)
ORDER STRIKING NOTICE AS
PROCEDURALLY DEFICIENT

v.

12

(Doc. 52)
13

MATHEW CATE, et al.,

14

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

15
16

Plaintiff Carlos Villegas, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

17 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 14, 2010. This action is proceeding on
18 Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendant Neubarth for acting with deliberate indifference
19 to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States
20 Constitution. This matter is set for jury trial on June 9, 2015, before the Honorable Anthony W.
21 Ishii.
22

On January 16, 2015, Defendant Neubarth filed a “Response to Court Order,” in which he

23 seeks to modify the scheduling orders to file a dispositive motion and to continue the trial date.
24 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). (Docs. 39, 51.) Defendant Neubarth’s response, which is not supported
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1 by citation to any authority, fails to comply with Local Rules 230(b) and (l). Accordingly, the
2 notice is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record as procedurally deficient.
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 20, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2