Carlos Villegas v. Cate et al

Filing 65

ORDER DENYING 63 Motion as Moot in Light of Amended Scheduling Order Reopening Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/19/15. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CARLOS VILLEGAS,

11

Plaintiff,
v.

12
13

MATHEW CATE, et al.,

14

Case No. 1:10-cv-01917-SKO (PC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT
IN LIGHT OF AMENDED SCHEDULING
ORDER REOPENING DISCOVERY
(Doc. 63)

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

15
16

Plaintiff Carlos Villegas, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

17 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 14, 2010. This action is proceeding on
18 Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendant Neubarth for acting with deliberate indifference
19 to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States
20 Constitution.
21

On March 13, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion entitled “Motion to Restart Time Order

22 Interrogatories.” On February 4, 2015, the Court issued an amended scheduling order setting a
23 new discovery deadline of July 9, 2015, and a new pretrial dispositive motion deadline of
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1 September 9, 2015. In light of the order reopening discovery, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve
2 interrogatories, which are a discovery device, is moot and is HEREBY DENIED on that ground.
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 19, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2