Hamilton v. Yates et al
Filing
15
ORDER Adopting 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/21/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
PAUL HAMILTON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
1:10-cv-1925-LJO-MJS (PC)
v.
J.A. YATES, et al.,
8
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
(ECF No. 11)
Defendants.
9
10
_______________________________/
11
Plaintiff Paul Hamilton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights
12
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
13
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
14
On January 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation
15
recommending that Plaintiff’s motion to remand be denied. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has filed
16
objections to the Findings and Recommendation. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff is correct in his
17
statement that the California Fifth District Court of Appeal did not dismiss this action. (Id.)
18
However, the California Fifth District Court of Appeal also found that Plaintiff’s statements were
19
ambiguous, and it appeared he was asserting a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-6 at 15.)
20
This finding provided grounds for removal of Plaintiff’s action to this Court.
21
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this
22
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
23
Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
24
analysis.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 17, 2012, are adopted in full; and
27
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 6) is DENIED.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 21, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
1
b9ed48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?