Hamilton v. Yates et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Certain Claims signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/09/2012. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PAUL C. HAMILTON, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 v. J.A. YATES, et al., 13 14 1:10-cv-1925-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS (ECF No. 23) Defendants. _______________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff Paul C. Hamilton (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights 17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 4, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations, 20 recommending dismissal of one of Plaintiff’s claims. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff has failed to file 21 objections. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this 23 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 24 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 25 analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1- 1 /// 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 4, 2012, are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment conditions of 5 confinement claim against Defendants Mattingly, Trimble, Spearman, and Yates; 6 3. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment be dismissed; and 7 4. Defendants shall file an answer or otherwise defend against this action within thirty 8 9 10 days of entry of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 November 9, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?