Hamilton v. Yates et al

Filing 57

ORDER ADOPTING 53 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/25/2014. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PAUL C. HAMILTON,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
ON THE PLEADINGS

J.A. YATES, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 50, 53)
Defendants.
CASE TO REMAIN OPEN

16
17

Case No. 1:10-cv-1925-LJO-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of California.
On August 12, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF
No. 50.) On September 17, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and
Recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 53.) Plaintiff timely filed
objections. (ECF No. 56.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has
conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by

1 proper analysis.
2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendations filed on September

3

17, 2014 (ECF No. 53), in full,

4

2. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 50), filed on

5

August 12, 2014, is DENIED, and

6
7
8
9

3. The case shall remain open.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 25, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2