Fuller v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 13

ORDER Adopting 12 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Dismissing Action, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim; ORDER that Dismissal is Subject to 28 USC 1915(g); ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/27/12. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BOBBY W. FULLER,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
A. HEDGPETH, et al.,

15
16

1:10-cv-01929-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 12.)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE
A CLAIM
ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

17
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE
18

Defendants.
_____________________________/

19
Bobby W. Fuller (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
20
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant
21

to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22
On January 6, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this
23
action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted
24
under § 1983. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
25
recommendations within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise
26
responded to the findings and recommendations.
27
28

1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

2

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

3

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

5

1.

6
7

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 6,
2012, are adopted in full;

2.

8

This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

9

3.

All pending motions are DENIED as moot;

10

4.

This dismissal is subject to the “three-strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. §

11
12
13

1915(g); and
5.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

Dated:
0m8i78

April 27, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2