Loring v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
STIPULATION to Extend Time and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/17/2011. ( Replies, if any, shall be filed on or before August 23, 2011) (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
4
5
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-Mail:rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff KIMBERLY LORING
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
KIMBERLY LORING,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security.
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
) Case No. 10-cv-01949-DLB
)
) STIPULATION EXTEND TIME;
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
TO THE HONORABLE DENNIS L. BECK, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF
THE DISTRICT COURT:
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their
21
respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall have a 7 day extension of time, to and
22
including August 23, 2011, in which to file plaintiff’s reply.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
-1-
1
This request is made at the request of Plaintiff’s counsel to allow additional
2
time to fully research the issued presented counsel is attending the judicial
3
conference.
4
DATE: August 16, 2011
5
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
6
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
7
BY: _______________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney for plaintiff Kimberly Loring
8
9
10
DATE: August 16, 2011
11
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
12
/s/ Donna W. Anderson*
BY: ____________________________
Donna W. Anderson
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for defendant Michael Astrue
|*authorized by e-mail|
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
20
It is so ordered. Plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, on or before August 23,
2011. The matter shall then stand submitted.
21
22
23
DATE: August 17, 2011
_/s/ Dennis L. Beck
THE HONORABLE DENNIS L. BECK
Magistrate Judge of the District Court
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?