Davis v. Kings County Probation

Filing 32

ORDER on Stipulated Dismissal, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/7/12: Accordingly to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the parties' stipulation of dismissal. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1

James J. Arendt, Esq.
Michelle E. Sassano, Esq.

Bar No. 142937
Bar No. 232368

2
3
4

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF KINGS

7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

DAVID L. DAVIS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KINGS COUNTY PROBATION and DOES )
1 to 50 inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-01953-AWI-SMS
STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND ORDER

Complaint Filed: 10/15/10
Trial Date: TBA

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff DAVID L. DAVIS,

18

and Defendant COUNTY OF KINGS, sued herein erroneously as KINGS COUNTY

19

PROBATION, through their attorney of record, hereby jointly request and stipulate to dismissal of

20

the entire action, with prejudice, all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

21
22

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 26, 2012
WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

23
24
By:
25
26
27
28
____________________________
Stipulated Dismissal and Order

/s/ James J. Arendt
James J. Arendt
Michelle E. Sassano
Attorneys for Defendants

1

DATED: April ____, 2012

2
3
By:
4

David L. Davis,
Appearing Pro Se

5
6
ORDER
7
Accordingly to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is
8
DIRECTED to close this action in light of the parties’ stipulation of dismissal.
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
0m8i78

May 7, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________
Stipulated Dismissal and Order

2