Abraham Chapa, III v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Responsive Brief signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/27/2011. The Court ADOPTS the parties' stipulation with the modification that Defendant'sbrief is DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 2, 2011.(Bradley, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

FRESNO DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

ABRAHAM CHAPA, III

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. 1:10-CV-01956-GSA
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE
BRIEF

19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval

21

of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time up to and through December 3, 2011, in

22

which to e-file his Responsive Brief. This extension is requested because the Commissioner is reviewing

23

the defensibility of this case. Counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience and respectfully requests

24

that the court grant this unopposed request for extension.

25
26
27
28

1
2

Dated:

Harvey P. Sackett
(As authorized via email on October 21, 2011)
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff

October 26, 2011

3
4
5

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

6
7
8

Dated: October 26, 2011

9

By:

/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney

10
11
12
13
14
15

ORDER
Defendant seeks an extension of time of thirty days “up to and through December 3, 2011,”
within which to file his opposition brief. By the Court’s calculation, a thirty day extension of time
would make Defendant’s brief due Friday, December 2, 2011. This is so because Plaintiff’s opening
brief was filed October 3, 2011 (Doc. 17 [10/3/11 + 30 = 11/2/11; 11/2/11 + 30 = 12/2/11]).
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the parties’ stipulation with the modification that Defendant’s
brief is DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 2, 2011.

16
IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

Dated:
6i0kij

October 27, 2011

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2