Abraham Chapa, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Responsive Brief signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/2/2011. (Bradley, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8943
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: theophous.reagans@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ABRAHAM CHAPA, III
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 1:10-CV-01956-GSA
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE
BRIEF
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval
21
of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 14-day extension of time up to and through December 16, 2011,
22
in which to e-file his Responsive Brief. This extension is requested because the Commissioner is continuing
23
to review the merits of the case. Counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience and respectfully
24
requests that the court grant this unopposed request for extension.
25
26
27
28
1
2
Harvey P. Sackett
(As authorized via email on October 21, 2011)
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: December 1, 2011
3
4
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
6
7
8
Dated: December 1, 2011
9
By:
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
10
ORDER
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated:
i70h38
December 2, 2011
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?