Ethridge v. Childs et al

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING 13 Plaintiff's Request to Supplement First Amended Complaint but Granting Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/2/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CARL ETHRIDGE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. CASE No. 1:10-cv-01962-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BUT GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 (ECF No. 13) 13 CHILDS, et al., THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 14 Defendants. 15 ________________________________/ 16 I. 17 PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 20, 2010, Plaintiff Carl Ethridge, a state prisoner proceeding pro se 18 and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff declined to extend Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for all 20 purposes and proceedings. (Decline Magistrate, ECF No. 9.) 21 The Court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint on December 29, 2011, and dismissed 22 it for failure to state a claim, but gave leave to file an amended complaint. (Order 23 Dismiss Compl., ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on January 23, 24 2012. (First. Am. Compl., ECF No. 12.) The First Amended Complaint has not yet 25 been screened. 26 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s supplemental amendment to First 27 Amended Complaint filed on December 21, 2012, which the Court construes as a 28 motion to supplement the First Amended Complaint. (Mot. Supp., ECF No. 13.) -1- 1 II. APPLICABLE LAW 2 Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend his 3 pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. 4 Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave of the court, or by written consent of the 5 adverse party, and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ . P. 6 15(a). 7 “Rule 15(a) is liberal and leave to amend shall be given when justice so 8 requires.” Amerisource Bergen Corp. v. Dialysis West, Inc., 465 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir. 9 2006), quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). 10 An amended pleading must be complete within itself without reference to another 11 pleading. Partial amendments are not permissible. Local Rule 220. 12 III. ANALYSIS 13 Here, Plaintiff asks to file a supplement to his underlying First Amended 14 Complaint to include a demand for jury trial. Plaintiff’s proposed supplement to the First 15 Amended Complaint is deficient because it is not a complete pleading in and of itself, 16 but instead is dependent upon the underlying pleading. 17 Any pleading must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that 18 the pleader is entitled to relief . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations 19 are not required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, 20 supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 21 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009), citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 22 555 (2007). A plaintiff must set forth “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state 23 a claim that is plausible on its face.” Id. Facial plausibility demands more than the mere 24 possibility that a defendant committed misconduct and, while factual allegations are 25 accepted as true, legal conclusions are not. Id. at 1949–50. 26 If Plaintiff wishes to file a second amended complaint, he may do so within thirty 27 days following service of this order. If he does so, he must file a pleading that is 28 consistent with the foregoing standards and complete in and of itself. -2- 1 Should Plaintiff fail to file a second amended complaint within this thirty day 2 period, the Court will assume he wishes to proceed on the underlying First Amended 3 Complaint. 4 IV. ORDER 5 Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Plaintiff’s supplemental amendment to First Amended Complaint 7 construed as a motion to supplement the First Amended Complaint (ECF 8 No. 13) is DENIED, and 9 2. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a second amended complaint by not 10 later than thirty days following service of this order, in the absence of a 11 timely filed second amended complaint, this matter will proceed on the 12 underlying First Amended Complaint. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: ci4d6 16 January 2, 2013 Michael J. Seng /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?