Marquez v. Quintero et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion for an Extension of Time to File Supplemental Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Update Plaintiff's Address signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/16/2012. Supplemental Opposition due by due by 9/18/2012. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

ANTHONY MARQUEZ,

10
11
12

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01965-BAM PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO MOTION
TO DISMISS

v.
I. QUINTERO, et al.,

(ECF No. 17)
13

Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT
TO UPDATE PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS

14
15

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
/

16
17

Plaintiff Anthony Marquez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this

18

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On July 13, 2012, an amended second

19

informational order was issued, and Plaintiff was granted an opportunity to file an opposition to

20

Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) On August 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion

21

entitled “notice of motion to amend initial complaint an [sic] augmentation of the record for an

22

additional request of an enlargement of time due to good cause demonstrated and circumstances

23

beyond Plaintiff[‘s] control.” (ECF No. 17.)

24

Upon review of the motion, Plaintiff states that he did not receive the July 13, 2012, order

25

until August 6, 2012, because he had been transferred to California Mens’ Colony, East State Prison,

26

Highway 1, P.O. Box 8101, San Luis Obispo, California 93409-8101. Plaintiff requests a thirty day

27

extension of time to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The Court finds good

28

cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3
4

motion to dismiss is granted;
2.

5
6

Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants’

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, may file an opposition
to Defendant Horban’s motion to dismiss; and

3.

The Clerk’s Office is directed to update Plaintiff’s address.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

August 16, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2