Marquez v. Quintero et al

Filing 21

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Second Motion To Extend Time To File Opposition In Response To Order (ECF No. 20 ), Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/18/2012. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY MARQUEZ,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.

1:10-cv-01965-BAM (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE OPPOSITION IN RESPONSE TO
ORDER

I. QUINTERO, et al,
(ECF No. 20)

15

Defendants.

16

________________________________/

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
17

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

18

1983. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on April 6, 2012. In light of the decision in Woods

19

v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 2012), Plaintiff was issued an amended notice of the

20

requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss and granted thirty days within which to file an

21

opposition. On August 16, 2012, Plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file an

22

opposition. On September 17, 2012,plaintiff filed a second motion for an extension of time.

23

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file
an opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
Cm411

September 18, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE