Coleman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/6/2011 to move to 4/20/2011 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/31/2011. (Kusamura, W)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Darolyn Y. Hamada (SBN: 192334) [e-mail] Natasha L. Mosley (SBN: 246352) [e-mail] SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1600 Irvine, California 92614-2546 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 949.475.0016 Attorneys for Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT

PAMELA COLEMAN, an individual, MARY BOWER, an individual, and 12 KATHLEEN PAISON, an individual,
11 13 14 15

Plaintiffs, vs.

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, a Massachusetts 16 corporation, and DOE MANUFACTURERS one through one 17 hundred.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 1:10-CV-01968-OWW-SKO Hon. Oliver W. Wanger STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER Complaint filed: 10/20/2010 Trial Date: None set

TO THE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiffs Pamela Coleman, Mary Bower, and Kathleen Paison and Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation ("BSC"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate to and jointly request a continuance of the Scheduling Conference based on the following: 1. The Court scheduled a Scheduling Conference for April 6, 2011. (See
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Court's October 21, 2010 Order, Doc. No. 6.)
88666 V1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2. 3.

BSC was served with the complaint on or about December 29, 2010. On February 16, 2011, BSC moved to dismiss this action, or in the

alternative, to dismiss certain plaintiffs. (See Doc. No. 9.) Defendant's motion is scheduled to be heard in this Court on April 11, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 4. All parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Scheduling

Conference be continued to April 20, 2011, or to a date preferred by this Court, in order for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto to be considered. 5. There is good cause to continue the scheduling conference until after the

Court issues a ruling on BSC's motion to dismiss. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Scheduling Conference currently set for April 6, 2011 be continued to April 20, 2011, or a date more convenient for the Court.

Dated: March 30, 2011

Respectfully Submitted, SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

By:

/s/ Natasha L. Mosley Darolyn Y. Hamada Natasha L. Mosley Attorneys for Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation

Dated: March 30, 2011

GIARDI KEESE

By:

/s/Amanda Kent (authorized on March 30, 2011) Thomas V. Girardi Amy F. Solomon Michael Kowsari Amanda Kent Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER
88666 V1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Scheduling Conference scheduled for April 6, 2011 is hereby continued to April 20, 2011.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2011

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER United States District Judge

3
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER
88666 V1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com