Coleman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Filing 38

STIPULATION and Joint Request to Continue Scheduling Conference and ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/11/2011. ( Scheduling Conference previously set for 7/22/2011 has been CONTINUED to 8/26/2011 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger) (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
5 Darolyn Y. Hamada (SBN: 192334) dhamada@shb.com Natasha L. Mosley (SBN: 246352) nmosley@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1600 Irvine, California 92614-2546 Telephone: 949.475.1500 Facsimile: 949.475.0016 6 Attorneys for Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT 10 11 PAMELA COLEMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, a Massachusetts 15 corporation, and DOE MANUFACTURERS one through one 16 hundred, 14 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10-CV-01968-OWW-SKO Judge: Hon. Oliver W. Wanger Dept.: 3 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER Complaint filed: 10/20/2010 Trial Date: None set TO THE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff Pamela Coleman and Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation 22 23 (“BSC”), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate to and jointly request a 24 continuance of the Scheduling Conference based on the following: 1. 25 26 Court’s April 12, 2011 Minute Order, Doc. No. 26.) 2. 27 28 The Court scheduled a Scheduling Conference for July 22, 2011. (See BSC was served with the first amended complaint on or about June 17, 2011. STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 88666 V3 3. 1 On July 7, 2011, BSC moved to dismiss this action. (See Doc. No. 34.) 2 Defendant’s motion is scheduled to be heard in this Court on August 15, 2011 at 3 10:00 a.m. 4. 4 All parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Scheduling 5 Conference be continued to August 26, 2011, or to a date preferred by this Court, in 6 order for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto to be 7 considered. 5. 8 9 There is good cause to continue the scheduling conference until after the Court issues a ruling on BSC’s motion to dismiss. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the 10 11 Scheduling Conference currently set for July 22, 2011, be continued to August 26, 12 2011, or a date more convenient for the Court. 13 14 Dated: July 11, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, 15 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 16 17 By: 18 19 /s/ Natasha L. Mosley Darolyn Y. Hamada Natasha L. Mosley Attorneys for Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation 20 21 Dated: July 11, 2011 GIARDI KEESE 22 23 By: 24 25 26 /s/Amanda Kent (authorized on July 11, 2011) Thomas V. Girardi Amy F. Solomon Michael Kowsari Amanda Kent Attorneys for Plaintiff 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER 88666 V3 The Scheduling Conference scheduled for July 22, 2011, is hereby continued to 1 2 August 26, 2011. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 11, 2011 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 DEAC_Signature-END: emm0d64h 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER 88666 V3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?