Vasquez v. Mayberg et al

Filing 71

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With Court Orders, Failure to Prosecute, and Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/20/2018. Second Amended Complaint or Show Cause Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

GEORGE VASQUEZ,

10

Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

11
12

Case No. 1:10-cv-01973-DAD-JDP

EDMUND G. BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

Plaintiff George Vasquez is a civil detainee held at the Coalinga State Hospital

15
16

proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30,

17

2018, the assigned U.S. District Judge entered an order granting plaintiff leave to file a Second

18

Amended Complaint within 30 days. ECF No. 66 at 3-4. More than 30 days have passed, and

19

plaintiff has not filed a Second Amended Complaint.
Accordingly, plaintiff George Vasquez is ordered to show cause why this case should not

20
21

be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders, failure to prosecute, and failure to state a

22

claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff is directed to file a written response within 14

23

days of this order. Plaintiff may respond to this order by filing a Second Amended Complaint,

24

as previously directed. See ECF Nos. 60 at 11-12; 66 at 3-4.

25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

November 20, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28

1