Vigil v. Yates, et al.

Filing 34

ORDER denying Motions for Screening 30 , 31 , 33 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/11/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

WILLIE PAUL VIGIL,

8

Case No. 1:10-cv-1977-LJO-SAB-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR SCREENING

v.

9

(ECF NOs. 30, 31, 33)
10

JAMES YATES, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

On July 20, 2015, August 14, 2015, and August 28, 2015, Plaintiff filed motions

13

14 requesting the Court to screen the third amended complaint. Plaintiff’s third amended complaint
15 is lengthy and includes multiple causes of action. Plaintiff is advised that the Court presently has
16 a large number of cases awaiting screening. This case is among those. Case management at this
17 Court proceeds by the order cases are received. Due to the caseload of the Court, and the Court’s
18 diligent handling of each individual case, rulings and decisions often take time. Plaintiff’s case
19 will be screened in due course and appropriate orders will issue.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to screen the third

20

21 amended complaint are denied.
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated:

January 11, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1