Wallen v. Ishihara-Liang Inc. et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension to Respond to Complaint, Signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/10/2010. Defendant's response to Complaint herein is due on or before 1/3/2011. (Arellano, S.)

Download PDF
Thomas E. Campagne #065375 Mary F. Lerner #235951 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation Airport Office Center 1685 North Helm Avenue Fresno, California 93727 Telephone: (559) 255-1637 Facsimile: (559) 252-9617 Attorneys for Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THERESA WALLEN, ) Case No. 1:10-cv-01981-OWW-DLB ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO ) RESPOND TO COMPLAINT vs. ) ) ISHIHARA-LIANG, INC., dba EDO YA) TOKYO CUISINE; AMI WINEPRESS,) L.P., ) ) Defendants. ) The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine, hereby stipulate to a second 21-day extension of time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint herein, through and including January 3, 2011. The parties are actively involved in settlement negotiations. This further extension is needed to allow for continued discussion concerning means of resolution of alleged ADA violations. Dated: December 9, 2010 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation By /s/ Mary F. Lerner Mary F. Lerner Attorneys for Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Edo Ya Tokyo Cuisine /// STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Page 1 Dated: December 9, 2010 Moore Law Firm By /s/ Tanya Eugene Levinson Tanya Eugene Levinson Attorneys for Plaintiff Theresa Wallen ORDER Based upon the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that Defendant IshiharaLiang, Inc., dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine's response to the Complaint herein is due on or before January 3, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: DEAC_Signature-END: December 10, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE emm0d64h

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?