Wallen v. Ishihara-Liang Inc. et al
STIPULATION and ORDER For Extension To Respond to Complaint, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/21/2010. (Defendant Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Rdo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine to respond to complaint on or before 1/30/2011.) (Gaumnitz, R)
Thomas E. Campagne #065375 Mary F. Lerner #235951 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation Airport Office Center 1685 North Helm Avenue Fresno, California 93727 Telephone: (559) 255-1637 Facsimile: (559) 252-9617 Attorneys for Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THERESA WALLEN, ) Case No. 1:10-cv-01981-OWW-DLB ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO vs. ) COMPLAINT ) ISHIHARA-LIANG, INC., dba EDO YA) TOKYO CUISINE; AMI WINEPRESS,) L.P., ) ) Defendants. )
The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine, hereby stipulate to a third extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint herein, through and including January 30, 2011. The parties are actively involved in settlement negotiations and are currently drafting a Settlement Agreement. This further extension is needed to allow for continued discussion concerning means of resolution of alleged ADA violations. Dated: December 21, 2010 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation By /s/ Mary F. Lerner Mary F. Lerner Attorneys for Ishihara-Liang, Inc., dba Edo Ya Tokyo Cuisine ///
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Dated: December 21, 2010
Moore Law Firm By /s/ Tanya Eugene Levinson Tanya Eugene Levinson Attorneys for Plaintiff Theresa Wallen
ORDER Based upon the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that Defendant IshiharaLiang, Inc., dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine's response to the Complaint herein is due on or before January 30, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
December 21, 2010
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?