Williams v. City of Merced et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER The Motion Hearing set for January 11, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. is CONTINUED to January 18, 2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/3/2013. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. CSB#69888 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621-1939 Tel: (510) 839-5200 Fax: (510) 839-3882 E/M: John.Burris@JohnBurrisLaw.com Attorneys for Gregory Williams DAVID E. DRIVON, ESQ. #158369 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID DRIVON 215 N. San Joaquin Street Stockton, CA 95202 Tel: (209) 942-3276 Fax: (209) 463-7668 E/M: Ddrivon@ Comcast.net DALE L. ALLEN, JR., SBN 145279 KEVIN P. ALLEN, SBN 252290 LOW, BALL & LYNCH 505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415)981-6630 Fax: (415) 982-1634 E/M: dallen@lowball.com E/M: kallen@lowball.com Attorneys for Defendants 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 (FRESNO) 17 GREGORY WILLIAMS, 18 Plaintiff, 19 vs 20 23 CITY OF MERCED; a municipal corporation; Merced police Officer PINNEGAR (ID#215) individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF MERCED; and DOES 1 through 15, inclusive, 24 Case 1:10-cv-01999-MJS STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEF AND THE HEARING DATE Defendants. 21 22 Honorable Michael J. Seng 25 26 27 28 PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case 1:10-cv-01999-OWW-MJS 1 1 The parties, Plaintiff Gregory Williams, and Defendants City of Merced, Officers 2 Pinnegar, et al., by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate that the time for filing 3 all remaining documents and noticed hearing in this matter be extended by one week, i.e.: 4 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment from December 28, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2012 to January 4, 2013; Defendants’ Reply Brief from January 4, 2013 to January 11, 2013, and the hearing in this matter from January 11, 2013 to January 18, 2013. 1. This action arises out of an encounter between Plaintiff Gregory Williams and Defendant City of Merced Police Officers, including Defendant Officer Pinnegar, in Plaintiff’s home on September 9, 2009, from which Plaintiff suffered injuries and was ultimately arrested. 12 2. Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Damages for Violation of Civil Rights on 13 14 October 21, 2010. 15 3. Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on December 14, 2012. 16 4. According to the Court’s scheduling order, Plaintiff’s Opposition to 17 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is due on December 28, 2012; Defendant’s 18 Reply is due on January 4, 2013, and the hearing is noticed for January 11, 2013. 19 5. Due to the Plaintiff’s counsels’ heavy caseload, holiday schedule and 20 21 holiday travel plans, Plaintiff needs additional time in which to prepare Plaintiff’s 22 Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Because extending time to file 23 Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief implicates all other deadlines in this matter, the parties request 24 that all remaining deadlines and the hearing date regarding Defendants’ Motion for 25 Summary Judgment be extended by one week, as follows: Plaintiff’s Opposition to 26 27 28 PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case 1:10-cv-01999-OWW-MJS 2 1 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment due on January 4, 2013; Defendants’ Reply 2 due on January 11, 2013, and the hearing be held on January 18, 2013. 3 4 5 6 6. To date, no previous time modifications have been made in this case by stipulation or by Court order. 7. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff and the 7 Defendants, through their respective counsel, that the time to file the remaining briefs in 8 this matter and the scheduled hearing date be extended by one week, as follows: Plaintiff’s 9 10 11 Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment from December 28, 2012 to January 4, 2013, Defendants’ Reply from January 4, 2013 to January 11, 2013, and the scheduled hearing from January 11, 2013, to January 18, 2013. 12 13 Dated: December 19, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 14 15 By:_/s/ Adante Pointer_ Adanté Pointer, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 17 18 Dated: December 19, 2012 LOW, BALL & LYNCH 19 20 22 By:__Kevin Allen_____________ Kevin P. Allen Attorneys for Defendants 23 ORDER 21 24 25 Good cause appearing, it is so Ordered and the January 11, 2013 Hearing is continued to January 18, 2013. 26 Dated: January 2, 2013 27 /s/Michael J. Seng U.S. Magistrate Judge 28 PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case 1:10-cv-01999-OWW-MJS 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case 1:10-cv-01999-OWW-MJS 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?