Vasquez v. Yu

Filing 16

ORDER Adopting 15 Findings and Recommendations Recommending Denying Plaintiff's Motions for a Preliminary Injunction 11 , 12 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/19/11. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
VINCENT VASQUEZ,

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02013-LJO-SMS PC

8
Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR A
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

9
v.
10
DR. J. YU, et al.,
11

(ECF Nos. 11, 12, 15)
Defendants.

12

/

13
Plaintiff Vincent Vasquez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
14
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
15
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
16
Plaintiff filed motions seeking a preliminary injunction requiring him to be transferred from
17
Corcoran State Prison to a prison that could care for his medical needs and that officials at Corcoran
18
State Prison not be allowed to overrule the recommendation made by his kidney specialist on
19
January 20, 2011 and exhibits on February 22, 2011 . (ECF Nos. 11, 12.) On June 17, 2011, the
20
Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which was served on the parties and
21
which contained notice to the Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were
22
to be filed within twenty one days. (ECF No. 15.) More than twenty days have passed and no
23
objections have been filed.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a
25
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings
26
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1

1

1.

The findings and recommendations, filed June 17, 2011, is adopted in full; and

2

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction, filed January 20, 2011, and February

3

22, 2011 are DENIED.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:
b9ed48

July 19, 2011

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2