Singleton, Sr. v. Eli Lilly, Co.
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff an extension of time to file amended complaint. Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of sixty (60) days to file his amended complaint. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/27/2011. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAMAR SINGLETON,
12
13
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02019-AWI-SKO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
14
ELI LILLY CO.,
(Doc. 13)
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
On June 6, 2011, Plaintiff LaMar Singleton ("Plaintiff") filed a first amended complaint
19
against Eli Lilly Co. ("Defendant"). (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff claimed that Defendant manufactured,
20
marketed, and sold Zyprexa. Plaintiff asserted that taking Zyprexa caused him to develop type 2
21
diabetes, obesity, severe metabolic complications with multiple cysts, and tumors on both kidneys.
22
Plaintiff stated that Defendant violated his constitutional rights and requested $75,000 in damages.
23
On June 29, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint and granted Plaintiff thirty (30)
24
days to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 12.) On July 25, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for a forty-
25
five (45) to sixty (60) day extension of time to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 13.) Plaintiff
26
asserts that the Kern Valley State Prison has been in a "continued lock-down" since he received
27
notice of the need to amend. (Doc. 13, 1:18-20.) Plaintiff further states that he needs additional time
28
to file his amended complaint "due to medical complications" (Doc. 13, 1:21-23.)
1
2
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS THAT Plaintiff shall be granted an extension
of sixty (60) days to file his amended complaint.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
ie14hj
July 27, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?