Miles v. Cates et al
Filing
31
ORDER STAYING Discovery Pending Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/3/12. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY MILES,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
MATTHEW CATES, et al,
15
1:10-cv-02055-MJS (PC)
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY
PENDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
(ECF No. 26)
_____________________________/
Plaintiff Anthony Miles (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On June 4, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss.
(ECF No. 25).
Defendants’ motion is currently pending.
21
On June 12, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to stay discovery and extend time
22
to respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests until the Court rules on Defendants’ motion to
23
dismiss. (ECF No. 26.) Defendants also request that, if necessary, they be granted forty-
24
five days after the Court rules on the motion to respond to Plaintiff’s pending discovery.
25
Good cause having been presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
27
28
Discovery is stayed in this action until the Court rules on Defendants’
motion to dismiss; and
2.
1
2
Defendants shall have forty-five days after the Court rules on the motion to
dismiss to respond to Plaintiff’s pending discovery.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
ci4d6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
July 3, 2012
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?