Al-Raheem v. Covenant Care
Filing
38
ORDER vacating hearing date of 9/10/12 and taking matter under submission. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/7/12. (Nazaroff, H)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
COVENANT CARE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
WANDA AL-RAHEEM,
9
10
11
12
13
1:10- cv-2064 AWI GSA
ORDER VACATING
HEARING DATE OF
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012, AND
TAKING MATTER UNDER
SUBMISSION
14
15
This is a civil rights action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for
16
damages and equitable relief by pro se plaintiff Wanda Al-Raheem (“Plaintiff”) against
17
defendant Covenant Care (“Defendant”). Currently before the court is Defendant’s motion to
18
dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendant’ motion to dismiss was
19
filed on July 20, 2012. As of the date of this order, no opposition to the motion has been filed.
20
The matter was scheduled for oral argument to be held September 10, 2012. The Court
21
has reviewed Plaintiffs’ motion. Opposition, which was due not later than August 24, 2012,
22
was not filed as of that date and consequently the motion may not be opposed at oral argument.
23
Local Rule 78-230(b). The court has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without
24
oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).
25
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of September
26
10, 2012, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of September 10, 2012, the
27
Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated:
h2ehf
September 7, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?