Al-Raheem v. Covenant Care

Filing 38

ORDER vacating hearing date of 9/10/12 and taking matter under submission. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/7/12. (Nazaroff, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COVENANT CARE, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) WANDA AL-RAHEEM, 9 10 11 12 13 1:10- cv-2064 AWI GSA ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 10, 2012, AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION 14 15 This is a civil rights action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 16 damages and equitable relief by pro se plaintiff Wanda Al-Raheem (“Plaintiff”) against 17 defendant Covenant Care (“Defendant”). Currently before the court is Defendant’s motion to 18 dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendant’ motion to dismiss was 19 filed on July 20, 2012. As of the date of this order, no opposition to the motion has been filed. 20 The matter was scheduled for oral argument to be held September 10, 2012. The Court 21 has reviewed Plaintiffs’ motion. Opposition, which was due not later than August 24, 2012, 22 was not filed as of that date and consequently the motion may not be opposed at oral argument. 23 Local Rule 78-230(b). The court has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without 24 oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). 25 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of September 26 10, 2012, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of September 10, 2012, the 27 Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: h2ehf September 7, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?