Moore v. Windecker Fuel, Inc. et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/22/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONALD MOORE,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
WINDECKER FUEL, INC., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

) No. 1:10-CV-2118-LJO-DLB
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
)
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants

19

Windecker Fuel, Inc., John E. Windecker dba Chevron aka Pacheco Chevron, Philip J.

20

Ruggiero, and Ethel E. Scrievers, the parties to this action, by and through their respective

21

counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned

22

action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Date: April 22, 2011

23

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

24
25

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

26
27
28

///

Moore v. Windecker Fuel, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 1

1

Date: April 22, 2011

LAW OFFICES OF BENJAMIN L.
RATLIFF

2
3
/s/ James T. Binion
James T. Binion, Attorneys for Defendants
Windecker Fuel, Inc.; John E. Windecker,
dba Chevron aka Pacheco Chevron; Philip
J. Ruggiero; and Ethel E. Scrievers

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
The parties having so stipulated,

10

this action is to be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
Dated:

16

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

April 22, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

17
18

b9ed48bb

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Moore v. Windecker Fuel, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 2