Trejo et al v. City of Shafter et al

Filing 32

ORDER Regarding Notice of Settlement, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/9/12. 21-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
JOSE TREJO, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF SHAFTER, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

7
8
9
10
11

1:10-CV-2119 AWI JLT

ORDER REGARDING
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
(Doc. No. 30)

12
13
14

On February 8, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a notice of settlement, which indicated that the case

15

has been settled in its entirety. See Doc. No.30; see also Local Rule 160. In light of the

16

settlement, it is appropriate to vacate all current dates and deadlines, including the July 17, 2012

17

trial date. Additionally, since one of the Plaintiffs is a minor, the settlement must be approved by

18

this Court. See Local Rule 202. Plaintiff will be ordered to file the appropriate motion.

19
20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

21
22

All currently set dates and deadlines, including the July 17, 2012, trial date, are
VACATED in light of Plaintiffs’ notice of settlement;

2.

Plaintiff shall file a motion for approval of settlement, as soon as possible but no later

23

than twenty-one (21) days after service of this order, with the Magistrate Judge, who will

24

then issue a Findings and Recommendation.1

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

Dated:
0m8i78

February 9, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1

Plaintiffs state that they anticipate filing a dismissal in 45 days. Plaintiffs do not explain why 45 days is
needed. For now, Plaintiffs will be ordered to follow the 21 day deadline of the local rules. See Local Rule 160.
However, if additional time is necessary, Plaintiffs may file a motion for extension of time with the Magistrate Judge.