Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 29 Stay of Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/2/2013. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BENITO GOMEZ,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:10-cv-2128 GSA
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING STAY OF
PROCEEDINGS
v.
(Doc. 29)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
16
17
On October 1, 2013, Defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
18
(“Defendant”), filed a motion to stay these proceedings in light of the federal government
19
shutdown. As federal employees, Defendant and her attorneys are prohibited from working on
20
this matter absent congressional appropriation of funds for the relevant federal entities. In light
21
of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Court will grant the stay immediately without
22
further briefing or argument. See Local Rule 102(d). Any party who opposes the stay or wishes
23
to lift the stay may file a motion for reconsideration or a motion to lift the stay at any time. See
24
Local Rule 230(j) and (b). Accordingly,
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
This action is STAYED until funding for Defendant and her attorneys is restored.
2.
Within five court days after funding is restored, Defendant shall file a notice
27
28
1
1
informing the Court of the number of days that her attorneys were unable to work.
2
All applicable dates and deadlines in the Court’s scheduling order for this matter
3
will be extended by the number of days that Defendant’s attorneys were unable to
4
work on account of the government shutdown.
3.
5
Along with the notice, Defendant shall file a proposed order lifting the stay and
identifying modifications made to the scheduling order.
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
11
October 2, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
DEAC_Signature-END:
cf0di0
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?