JLG Enterprises, Inc. v. Excalibur Sires, Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Excalibur as to why default judgment should not be entered in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim should not be dismissed; ORDER requiring JLG to submit proof of amount of damages sought in default judgment. Wit hin ten (10) days after service of this order, JLG shall submit proof of its damages for the amount sought in default judgment, including supporting declarations and documentation; Within twenty (20) days after service of this order, Excalibur is ORD ERED to show cause in writing as to why default judgment should not be entered against Excalibur in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim should not be dismissed with prejudice due to Excalibur's failure to provide discovery respons es and failure to comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery order and August 12, 2011, order to show cause; Excalibur's counsel is DIRECTED to take all reasonable actions to effect service of this order upon Excalibur; and Excalibur is warned that the Court will recommend the imposition of a case terminating sanction entering default judgment in favor of JLG and dismissing Excalibur's counterclaim with prejudice if Excalibur fails to comply with this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/9/2011. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JLG ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation, 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, v. EXCALIBUR SIRES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 12 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02138-AWI-SKO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY EXCALIBUR AS TO WHY DEFAULT JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF JLG AND WHY EXCALIBUR’S COUNTERCLAIM SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED ORDER REQUIRING JLG TO SUBMIT PROOF OF AMOUNT OF DAMAGES SOUGHT IN DEFAULT JUDGMENT Defendant. 13 14 EXCALIBUR SIRES, INC., 15 16 17 Counterclaimant, v. 18 JLG ENTERPRISES, INC., 19 20 Counterdefendant. ___________________________________/ 21 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 On June 1, 2011, Plaintiff JLG Enterprises, Inc., ("JLG") filed a motion to compel based on 24 Defendant Excalibur Sires, Inc.'s ("Excalibur") complete failure to provide responses to JLG's 25 outstanding discovery requests consisting of Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests 26 for Production of Documents. (Doc. 60.) Excalibur filed a statement of non-opposition to the 27 motion and a declaration from counsel in opposition to JLG's request for sanctions. (Docs. 63, 63-1.) 28 1 On June 27, 2011, the Court issued an order requiring Excalibur to provide responses to 2 JLG's Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents within 30 days from the date of the 3 order. (Doc. 67.) JLG requested that it be awarded reasonable expenses for the motion as well as 4 additional monetary sanctions for Excalibur's failure to respond to the discovery requests. The Court 5 held in abeyance its decision as to an award of sanctions and apportionment of any reasonable 6 attorney's fees until Excalibur provided responses to the outstanding discovery. 7 4:13-5:18.) (Doc. 67, 8 On August 2, 2011, JLG filed a status report indicating that Excalibur did not comply with 9 the Court's June 27, 2011, order and that no responses to the outstanding discovery requests were 10 served. (Doc. 69.) In its status report, JLG renewed its request that it be awarded the reasonable 11 attorney's fees associated with the motion. (Doc. 69, 2:5.) Further, JLG requested that the Court 12 impose a case-terminating sanction and enter default judgment against Excalibur. (Doc. 69, 2:6-12.) 13 On August 12, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause in which Excalibur was ordered 14 to file a statement within ten (10) days of the order as to why monetary sanctions or default judgment 15 should not be imposed against it for failing to comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery 16 order. (Doc. 70.) The Court cautioned Excalibur that, beyond any monetary sanction that would be 17 imposed, the Court would be inclined to recommend terminating sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 37(b)(1) if Excalibur did not respond to the order to show cause. (Doc. 70, 19 3:1-6.) Excalibur failed to file a response. 20 On August 17, 2011, JLG filed a statement of additional costs, indicating that JLG had 21 incurred additional attorney's fees due to Excalibur's failure to comply with the Court's June 27, 22 2011, discovery order. (Doc. 71.) 23 For the reasons set forth below, the Court ORDERS Excalibur to SHOW CAUSE as to why 24 default judgment should not be entered in favor of JLG against Excalibur and why Excalibur's 25 counterclaim should not be dismissed with prejudice. 26 II. DISCUSSION 27 The Court noted in its August 12, 2011, order to show cause that pursuant to Federal Rule 28 of Civil Procedure 37(b)(1), a party's failure to comply with a court's discovery order may be treated 2 1 as contempt of court, and the court may order the imposition of sanctions, including dismissing the 2 action or proceeding in whole or in part and rendering a default judgment against the disobedient 3 party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v)-(vi). Further, the Court noted that it must order the payment 4 of attorney's fees when a party fails to obey a discovery order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(c). 5 The Court cautioned Excalibur that "beyond any monetary sanctions imposed, the Court will 6 be inclined to impose a case terminating sanction if Excalibur fails to respond to this order to show 7 cause." (Doc. 70, 3:3-6 (emphasis omitted).) Nonetheless, Excalibur failed to respond. 8 Accordingly, Excalibur is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why default judgment 9 should not be entered against Excalibur and in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim 10 should not be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(v)-(vi) due to Excalibur's 11 failure to (1) respond to discovery, (2) comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery order 12 compelling responses to JLG's Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, and 13 (3) respond to the Court's August 12, 2011, order to show cause as to why monetary sanctions or 14 default judgment should not be imposed. (Docs. 67, 70.) Excalibur is warned that failure to 15 respond to this order to show cause will result in the Court's recommendation that a case- 16 terminating sanction be imposed beyond any monetary sanctions that will be awarded. 17 In addition, JLG is ordered to submit proof of damages for the amount sought in default 18 judgment, including supporting declarations and documentation, in accordance with Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) concerning applications for default judgment by the Court. 20 III. CONCLUSION AND ORDER 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Within ten (10) days after service of this order, JLG shall submit proof of its 23 damages for the amount sought in default judgment, including supporting 24 declarations and documentation; 25 2. Within twenty (20) days after service of this order, Excalibur is ORDERED to 26 show cause in writing as to why default judgment should not be entered against 27 Excalibur in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim should not be dismissed 28 with prejudice due to Excalibur's failure to provide discovery responses and failure 3 1 to comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery order and August 12, 2011, 2 order to show cause; 3 3. 4 Excalibur's counsel is DIRECTED to take all reasonable actions to effect service of this order upon Excalibur; and 5 4. Excalibur is warned that the Court will recommend the imposition of a case- 6 terminating sanction entering default judgment in favor of JLG and dismissing 7 Excalibur's counterclaim with prejudice if Excalibur fails to comply with this 8 order. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: ie14hj September 9, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?