JLG Enterprises, Inc. v. Excalibur Sires, Inc.
Filing
72
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Excalibur as to why default judgment should not be entered in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim should not be dismissed; ORDER requiring JLG to submit proof of amount of damages sought in default judgment. Wit hin ten (10) days after service of this order, JLG shall submit proof of its damages for the amount sought in default judgment, including supporting declarations and documentation; Within twenty (20) days after service of this order, Excalibur is ORD ERED to show cause in writing as to why default judgment should not be entered against Excalibur in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim should not be dismissed with prejudice due to Excalibur's failure to provide discovery respons es and failure to comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery order and August 12, 2011, order to show cause; Excalibur's counsel is DIRECTED to take all reasonable actions to effect service of this order upon Excalibur; and Excalibur is warned that the Court will recommend the imposition of a case terminating sanction entering default judgment in favor of JLG and dismissing Excalibur's counterclaim with prejudice if Excalibur fails to comply with this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/9/2011. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JLG ENTERPRISES, INC., a California
corporation,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
EXCALIBUR SIRES, INC., a Minnesota
corporation, and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02138-AWI-SKO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY
EXCALIBUR AS TO WHY DEFAULT
JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE
ENTERED IN FAVOR OF JLG AND
WHY EXCALIBUR’S
COUNTERCLAIM SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
ORDER REQUIRING JLG TO
SUBMIT PROOF OF AMOUNT OF
DAMAGES SOUGHT IN DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
Defendant.
13
14
EXCALIBUR SIRES, INC.,
15
16
17
Counterclaimant,
v.
18
JLG ENTERPRISES, INC.,
19
20
Counterdefendant.
___________________________________/
21
22
I. INTRODUCTION
23
On June 1, 2011, Plaintiff JLG Enterprises, Inc., ("JLG") filed a motion to compel based on
24
Defendant Excalibur Sires, Inc.'s ("Excalibur") complete failure to provide responses to JLG's
25
outstanding discovery requests consisting of Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests
26
for Production of Documents. (Doc. 60.) Excalibur filed a statement of non-opposition to the
27
motion and a declaration from counsel in opposition to JLG's request for sanctions. (Docs. 63, 63-1.)
28
1
On June 27, 2011, the Court issued an order requiring Excalibur to provide responses to
2
JLG's Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents within 30 days from the date of the
3
order. (Doc. 67.) JLG requested that it be awarded reasonable expenses for the motion as well as
4
additional monetary sanctions for Excalibur's failure to respond to the discovery requests. The Court
5
held in abeyance its decision as to an award of sanctions and apportionment of any reasonable
6
attorney's fees until Excalibur provided responses to the outstanding discovery.
7
4:13-5:18.)
(Doc. 67,
8
On August 2, 2011, JLG filed a status report indicating that Excalibur did not comply with
9
the Court's June 27, 2011, order and that no responses to the outstanding discovery requests were
10
served. (Doc. 69.) In its status report, JLG renewed its request that it be awarded the reasonable
11
attorney's fees associated with the motion. (Doc. 69, 2:5.) Further, JLG requested that the Court
12
impose a case-terminating sanction and enter default judgment against Excalibur. (Doc. 69, 2:6-12.)
13
On August 12, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause in which Excalibur was ordered
14
to file a statement within ten (10) days of the order as to why monetary sanctions or default judgment
15
should not be imposed against it for failing to comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery
16
order. (Doc. 70.) The Court cautioned Excalibur that, beyond any monetary sanction that would be
17
imposed, the Court would be inclined to recommend terminating sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule
18
of Civil Procedure 37(b)(1) if Excalibur did not respond to the order to show cause. (Doc. 70,
19
3:1-6.) Excalibur failed to file a response.
20
On August 17, 2011, JLG filed a statement of additional costs, indicating that JLG had
21
incurred additional attorney's fees due to Excalibur's failure to comply with the Court's June 27,
22
2011, discovery order. (Doc. 71.)
23
For the reasons set forth below, the Court ORDERS Excalibur to SHOW CAUSE as to why
24
default judgment should not be entered in favor of JLG against Excalibur and why Excalibur's
25
counterclaim should not be dismissed with prejudice.
26
II. DISCUSSION
27
The Court noted in its August 12, 2011, order to show cause that pursuant to Federal Rule
28
of Civil Procedure 37(b)(1), a party's failure to comply with a court's discovery order may be treated
2
1
as contempt of court, and the court may order the imposition of sanctions, including dismissing the
2
action or proceeding in whole or in part and rendering a default judgment against the disobedient
3
party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v)-(vi). Further, the Court noted that it must order the payment
4
of attorney's fees when a party fails to obey a discovery order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(c).
5
The Court cautioned Excalibur that "beyond any monetary sanctions imposed, the Court will
6
be inclined to impose a case terminating sanction if Excalibur fails to respond to this order to show
7
cause." (Doc. 70, 3:3-6 (emphasis omitted).) Nonetheless, Excalibur failed to respond.
8
Accordingly, Excalibur is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why default judgment
9
should not be entered against Excalibur and in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim
10
should not be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(v)-(vi) due to Excalibur's
11
failure to (1) respond to discovery, (2) comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery order
12
compelling responses to JLG's Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, and
13
(3) respond to the Court's August 12, 2011, order to show cause as to why monetary sanctions or
14
default judgment should not be imposed. (Docs. 67, 70.) Excalibur is warned that failure to
15
respond to this order to show cause will result in the Court's recommendation that a case-
16
terminating sanction be imposed beyond any monetary sanctions that will be awarded.
17
In addition, JLG is ordered to submit proof of damages for the amount sought in default
18
judgment, including supporting declarations and documentation, in accordance with Federal Rule
19
of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) concerning applications for default judgment by the Court.
20
III. CONCLUSION AND ORDER
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1.
Within ten (10) days after service of this order, JLG shall submit proof of its
23
damages for the amount sought in default judgment, including supporting
24
declarations and documentation;
25
2.
Within twenty (20) days after service of this order, Excalibur is ORDERED to
26
show cause in writing as to why default judgment should not be entered against
27
Excalibur in favor of JLG and why Excalibur's counterclaim should not be dismissed
28
with prejudice due to Excalibur's failure to provide discovery responses and failure
3
1
to comply with the Court's June 27, 2011, discovery order and August 12, 2011,
2
order to show cause;
3
3.
4
Excalibur's counsel is DIRECTED to take all reasonable actions to effect service of
this order upon Excalibur; and
5
4.
Excalibur is warned that the Court will recommend the imposition of a case-
6
terminating sanction entering default judgment in favor of JLG and dismissing
7
Excalibur's counterclaim with prejudice if Excalibur fails to comply with this
8
order.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
ie14hj
September 9, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?