Sosa v. Kaur

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL of Action, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/6/11: The action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1
2
3

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jesus Sosa

6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

JESUS SOSA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
PRITPAL KAUR, an individual,

15

Defendant.

16
17

) No. 1:10-CV-02142-OWW-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jesus Sosa and Defendant

19

Pritpal Kaur, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to

20

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with

21

prejudice in its entirety.

22

Date: June 6, 2011

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

23
24
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Jesus Sosa

25
26
27

/

28

/

Sosa v. Kaur
Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 1

1

Date: June 6, 2011

FISHMAN, LARSEN, GOLDRING &
ZEITLER

2
3
4

/s/ Amanda Bishop
Amanda S. Bishop, Attorneys
for Defendant Pritpal Kaur

5
6

ORDER

7
8

The parties having so stipulated,

9

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

10
11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

15
16
17

June 6, 2011

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

emm0d64h

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Sosa v. Kaur
Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 2