BR North 223, LLC v. Glieberman et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/2/2011. Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED Without Prejudice. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BR NORTH 223, LLC, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BERNARD GLIEBERMAN, both ) individually and as trustee of BERNARD ) GLIEBERMAN REVOCABLE LIVING ) TRUST dated June 8, 2001 as amended, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) 1:10cv02153 OWW DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Document 22) 18 19 On May 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that Plaintiff’s 20 Motion for Default Judgment be DENIED without prejudice. This Findings and Recommendation 21 was served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be 22 filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of the order. No objections were filed.1 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 24 novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the 25 Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 1 27 On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application to extend time to effectuate service. The court granted Plaintiff’s application on May 27, 2011. 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendation issued May 9, 2011, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 2, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?