BR North 223, LLC v. Glieberman et al
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/2/2011. Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED Without Prejudice. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
BR NORTH 223, LLC,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BERNARD GLIEBERMAN, both
)
individually and as trustee of BERNARD )
GLIEBERMAN REVOCABLE LIVING
)
TRUST dated June 8, 2001 as amended,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
1:10cv02153 OWW DLB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION
(Document 22)
18
19
On May 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that Plaintiff’s
20
Motion for Default Judgment be DENIED without prejudice. This Findings and Recommendation
21
was served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be
22
filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of the order. No objections were filed.1
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de
24
novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the
25
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.
26
1
27
On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application to extend time to effectuate service. The court granted
Plaintiff’s application on May 27, 2011.
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendation issued May 9, 2011, is ADOPTED IN FULL;
3
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 2, 2011
emm0d6
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?