Thomas v. Razo, et al.

Filing 45

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 44 and Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 39 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/2/13. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

ROBERT THOMAS,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
J. RAZO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:10cv02173 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(Document 44)

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff Robert Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 22, 2010.
On September 21, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter
was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
Rule 302.
On February 12, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. The Findings and Recommendations

24
25
26

were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and
Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Neither party has filed objections.

27
28
1

1
2
3

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 12, 2013, are ADOPTED in

6
7

full; and
2.

8

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 39) is DENIED.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12

Dated: April 2, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

13
14

0m8i788

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2