Thomas v. Razo, et al.
Filing
50
ORDER directing Parties to notify court whether a Settlement Conference before a U.S. Magistrate Judge would be beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/18/2013. 15-Day Deadline.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ROBERT THOMAS,
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
J. RAZO, et al.,
10
Defendants.
1:10cv02173 AWI DLB PC
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO NOTIFY
THE COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE BEFORE A UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE WOULD BE
BENEFICIAL
FIFTEEN DAY DEADLINE
11
12
Plaintiff Robert Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
13
forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on an
14
Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Razo, Moreno, Brown, Vera, Vasquez
15
and Holguin. Trial is currently set for February 25, 2014.
16
Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants are
17
each to file a written response indicating whether a Court settlement conference would be beneficial
18
in resolving this action. If both parties agree, the Court will issue a further scheduling order setting
19
this matter for settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge or District Judge from the United
20
States District Court, Eastern District of California.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
October 18, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
9b0hied
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?