Solis v. Allison

Filing 3

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:10-cv-3053 DAD HC) to Fresno (1:10-cv-2178 DLB HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/22/2010. (Yin, K)

(HC) Solis v. Allison

Doc. 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. K. ALLISON, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee. In his application, petitioner challenges the March 26, 2009 decision of the California Board of Parole Hearings ("Board") to deny him parole. Petitioner is confined in Kings County. Kings County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ASDRUBAL SOLIS, Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-3053 DAD P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9:kly soli3053.109

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: November 22, 2010.

2