Moore v. Geham
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/22/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: (408) 298-2000
Facsimile: (408) 298-6046
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
RONALD MOORE,
) No: 1:10-CV-02188-OWW-DLB
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
Plaintiffs,
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
FAHD G. GEHAM dba STAR ONE MART, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore (“Plaintiff”) and
19
Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak (erroneously sued herein as Fahd G. Geham) dba Star One Mart
20
(“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
21
Procedure 41(a)(2), the action be dismissed with prejudice.
22
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant that this case has been
23
settled as between them and all issues and controversies have been resolved to their mutual
24
satisfaction. Plaintiff and Defendant request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the
25
terms of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.
26
of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).
27
//
28
//
Moore v. Geham
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 1
1
Date: June 22, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
2
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore
3
4
5
6
Date: June 22, 2011
LANG, ROBERT & PATCH
7
/s/ Charles Trudrung Taylor
Charles Trudrung Taylor, Attorneys for
Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak dba Star
One Mart
8
9
10
ORDER
11
12
The parties having so stipulated,
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
14
1.
Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak (erroneously sued
15
herein as Fahd G. Geham) dba Star One Market shall comply with the terms of the confidential
16
Settlement Agreement and Release in Full, the terms of which are incorporated herein by
17
reference.
18
2.
By consent of Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak, the
19
Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the
20
settlement agreement.
3.
21
22
Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the action is dismissed with
prejudice in its entirety.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
Dated:
June 22, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
emm0d64h
28
Moore v. Geham
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?