Moore v. Geham

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/22/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: (408) 298-2000 Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ronald Moore 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 RONALD MOORE, ) No: 1:10-CV-02188-OWW-DLB ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF Plaintiffs, ) ACTION; ORDER ) vs. ) FAHD G. GEHAM dba STAR ONE MART, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore (“Plaintiff”) and 19 Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak (erroneously sued herein as Fahd G. Geham) dba Star One Mart 20 (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure 41(a)(2), the action be dismissed with prejudice. 22 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant that this case has been 23 settled as between them and all issues and controversies have been resolved to their mutual 24 satisfaction. Plaintiff and Defendant request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the 25 terms of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. 26 of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). 27 // 28 // Moore v. Geham Stipulation for Dismissal; Order Page 1 1 Date: June 22, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 2 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore 3 4 5 6 Date: June 22, 2011 LANG, ROBERT & PATCH 7 /s/ Charles Trudrung Taylor Charles Trudrung Taylor, Attorneys for Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak dba Star One Mart 8 9 10 ORDER 11 12 The parties having so stipulated, 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 14 1. Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak (erroneously sued 15 herein as Fahd G. Geham) dba Star One Market shall comply with the terms of the confidential 16 Settlement Agreement and Release in Full, the terms of which are incorporated herein by 17 reference. 18 2. By consent of Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant Fahd G. Mubarak, the 19 Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the 20 settlement agreement. 3. 21 22 Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: June 22, 2011 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: emm0d64h 28 Moore v. Geham Stipulation for Dismissal; Order Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?