Moore v. Mendoza, et al.

Filing 33

STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal of Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/30/11: This action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
K. Randoloph Moore, SBN 106933
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

) No. 1:10-CV-2198-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
Plaintiff,
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
JOSE MENDOZA; MARTHA MENDOZA )
dba LA ESTRELLA MARKET #2; HENRY )
)
GEE and DAISY GEE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
RONALD MOORE,

19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants

20

Jose Mendoza, Martha Mendoza dba La Estrella Market #2, Henry Gee and Daisy Gee, the

21

parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of

22

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its

23

entirety.

24

Date: September 30, 2011

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

25
26

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

27
28

Moore v. Mendoza, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 1

1

Date: September 30, 2011

MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES

2
3

/s/ Michael D. Welch
Michael D. Welch, Attorney for
Defendants Jose Mendoza, Martha
Mendoza dba La Estrella Market #2;
Henry Gee and Daisy Gee

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9

The parties having so stipulated,

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

Dated:

September 30, 2011

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
DEAC_Signature-END:

15

ie14hje

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Moore v. Mendoza, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 2