Severson v. Igbinosa et al

Filing 25

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF to Respond to Court re Filing of Document Under Seal, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 3/2/2011. Response due within fifteen (15) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
-GBC (PC) Severson v. Igbinosa et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Timothy J. Severson ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 9, 2010, the Court issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. At the same time, an order was issued directing the Clerk's Office to serve a courtesy copy upon the Receiver's Office, requesting that they check to ensure that Plaintiff was not being removed from a necessary, effective treatment protocol arbitrarily and without a sound medical basis. The Court is in receipt of an informal response from the Receiver's Office, which was also sent to the Office of the Attorney General and Plaintiff. The Court will provide Plaintiff with an opportunity to address whether this informal response should be filed under seal. In his response Plaintiff needs to state why the document should be filed under seal if that is his request. /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TIMOTHY J. SEVERSON, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02217-AWI-GBC PC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO COURT FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE F. IGBINOSA, et al., Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: cm411 Accordingly it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to the order directing Plaintiff to respond within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 2, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?