Hoch v. Mayberg et al
Filing
71
ORDER Granting Defendant Sanzberro's Request to Amend Discovery and Scheduling Order 70 ; ORDER Amending Discovery and Scheduling Order 69 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/13/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CORY HOCH,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:10-cv-02258 AWI DLB PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
SANZBERRO’S REQUEST TO AMEND
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER
[ECF No. 70]
STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER AMENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER
[ECF No. 69]
16
17
Plaintiff Cory Hoch (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 6, 2010. This action is
19
proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed May 1, 2010, against Defendant Sanzberro
20
for violation of the Fourth Amendment. On November 7, 2014, the Court issued a discovery and
21
scheduling order. The order directed Defendant Sanzberro to produce information from the
22
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) and to take the deposition of
23
Plaintiff at CDCR. On November 12, 2014, Defendant Sanzberro filed the instant request to amend
24
the discovery and scheduling order to reflect the fact that Defendant Sanzberro was employed by the
25
Department of State Hospitals at Coalinga State Hospital, not by the CDCR, and Plaintiff Hock was
26
a civil detainee housed at Coalinga State Hospital, not a CDCR facility.
27
Good cause having been presented, and good cause appearing therefor, Defendant
28
Sanzberro’s request is GRANTED. The discovery and scheduling order is amended to omit the
1
1
2
direction to produce information related to “inmates” and to CDCR, and to take depositions at a
“correctional” facility. (ECF No. 69 at 1:27, 2:8, 2:15, 2:20, 3:11.)
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
November 13, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?