Vargas v. Hubbard et al

Filing 26

ORDER Regarding Motions At Dockets 19 and 24 , signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/19/2013. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VICTOR M. VARGAS, Case No. 1:10-cv-02273-RRB Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS AT DOCKETS 19 and 24 vs. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. At Dockets 19 and 24 Victor M. Vargas, a civil committee in the Coalinga State Hospital appearing pro se, filed duplicate Applications to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The application at Docket 19 was filed concurrently with his first Notice of Appeal; the application at Docket 24 was filed after the appeal was processed to the Court of Appeals. This Court Dismissed the First Amended Complaint and revoked Vargas’s in forma pauperis status.1 This Court assumes that Vargas’s intent is to continue his in forma pauperis status on appeal. This Court, having already ruled on the matter, that request should be addressed to the Ninth Circuit. Accordingly, the application at Docket 19 is stricken as superfluous and the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to forward a copy of the application at Docket 24 to the Court of Appeals, together with a copy of this Order, for such further action as that Court may deem appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2013. S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Docket 17.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?