United States of America et al v. Reid-Bills

Filing 4

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE RE: ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS Show Cause Hearing set for 2/11/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Show Cause Response due by 1/14/2011. signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/10/2010. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
-MJS United States of America et al v. Reid-Bills Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GLEN F. DORGAN (SBN 160502) Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for Petitioners United States of America and Revenue Officer Lorena Ramos UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LORENA RAMOS, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service, ) ) ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) JANET REID-BILLS, ) ) Respondent ) ) ____________________________________ ) Case No. 1:10-cv-02276-LJO-MJS O R D E R TO SHOW CAUSE RE: E N F O R C E M E N T OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS Date: Friday, February 11, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 6 (Honorable Michael J. Seng) Upon review of Petitioners United States of America and Revenue Officer Lorena Ramos' Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons and the Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed in support of the petition, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent, JANET REID-BILLS, appear before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, in Courtroom No. 6, in the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, on Friday, February 11, 2011, at 10:0 a.m. to show cause why she should not be compelled to obey the Internal Revenue Service summons served upon her on January 6, 2010, and attached to the United States' Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons. /// /// 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with one copy each of the Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons and the Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed in support of the petition, shall be served upon Respondent on or before January 14, 2011, unless such service cannot be made despite reasonable efforts. If Petitioners are unable to serve Respondent despite making reasonable efforts to do so, the documents may be served by any other means of service permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(e) or petitioners may request a court order granting leave to serve by other means. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(a)(5). IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that within 14 days of service of a copy of this Order to Show Cause and accompanying papers, Respondent shall file and serve a written response to the Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons, supported by appropriate declaration(s), as well as any motions the Respondent desires to make. The United States may file a reply. All motions and issues raised by the Respondent will be considered on the return date of this Order, and any uncontested allegations in the Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons will be deemed admitted. Issues that are not raised by motion, or are not brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by declaration(s), will not be considered on the return date of this Order. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that if the summons is ordered to be enforced, the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce its order by its contempt power. IT IS SO ORDERED. D a te d : ci4d6 December 10, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Michael J. Seng 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?