Tyrone D. Newman v. James D. Hartley et al

Filing 6

ORDER To Submit Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Or Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/29/2010. (Motion for IFP due by 2/16/2011) (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application) (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
(PC)Tyrone D. Newman v. James D. Hartley et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P la in tiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in the Central District of California. The Court will o r d e r Plaintiff to re-submit an application using the forms provided in this district. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TYRONE D. NEWMAN, Plaintiff, vs. WARDEN JAMES B. HARTLEY, et al., Defendants. / 1:10-cv-02292 SKO (PC) ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 45 DAYS Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has not paid the $350.00 filing fee, or submitted a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. No requests for extension will be granted without a showing of good cause. Within sixty (60) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his/her prison trust statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0mee December 29, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?