Mussenden v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER For the Award of Attorney's Fees, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/8/2012. (IT IS SO ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $6,000.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration KATHRYN R. WATSON Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8928 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Kathryn.Watson@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MARY KATHERINE MUSSENDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) Case No. 1:10cv02313 LJO DLB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, 21 subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to 22 Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of six thousand dollars and no cents 23 ($6,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by 24 counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 25 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will 26 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant 27 to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether 28 the fees, expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s 1 Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine 2 whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees, expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 4 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of 5 fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Sengthiene Bosavanh, pursuant to the assignment 6 executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees 8 and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. 9 Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that 10 Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees, expenses, and costs in 11 connection with this action. 12 13 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA. 14 Respectfully submitted, 15 16 17 Dated: March 8, 2012 /s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh (As authorized via email) SENGTHIEN BOSVANH Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: March 8, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 /s/ Kathryn R. Watson KATHRYN R. WATSON Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 26 27 28 2 1 ORDER 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $6,000.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: 9b0hie March 8, 2012 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?