Spearman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 10

ORDER Denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Commence Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 2/11/13. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TEDDY L. SPEARMAN, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02320-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMMENCE DISCOVERY 9 v. 10 (ECF No. 9) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 / 13 Plaintiff Teddy L. Spearman (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 14 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau 15 of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil 16 rights by federal actors. Plaintiff filed his original complaint on November 29, 2010, which is 17 currently pending screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) On February 8, 2013, 18 Plaintiff filed a motion to commence discovery pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26. 19 (ECF No. 9.) 20 The discovery phase of this litigation is not yet open. Plaintiff is directed to paragraph eight 21 of the Court’s First Informational Order, filed December 14, 2010. (ECF No. 5.) In that order, 22 Plaintiff was specifically informed that he may not conduct discovery until Defendants file an answer 23 and the Court issues the discovery order. 24 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to commence discovery is hereby DENIED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: i1eed4 February 11, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?