Spearman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Filing
10
ORDER Denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Commence Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 2/11/13. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
TEDDY L. SPEARMAN,
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02320-SAB (PC)
8
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMMENCE DISCOVERY
9
v.
10
(ECF No. 9)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
/
13
Plaintiff Teddy L. Spearman (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
14
pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau
15
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil
16
rights by federal actors. Plaintiff filed his original complaint on November 29, 2010, which is
17
currently pending screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) On February 8, 2013,
18
Plaintiff filed a motion to commence discovery pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26.
19
(ECF No. 9.)
20
The discovery phase of this litigation is not yet open. Plaintiff is directed to paragraph eight
21
of the Court’s First Informational Order, filed December 14, 2010. (ECF No. 5.) In that order,
22
Plaintiff was specifically informed that he may not conduct discovery until Defendants file an answer
23
and the Court issues the discovery order.
24
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to commence discovery is hereby DENIED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated:
i1eed4
February 11, 2013
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?